Press Release IV
By O. Shimura CCMCC

Date: 03-12-2002
Chronology Of A Murder
By Kamakura

This chronology is the result of our own investigation, witness reports, and highly reliable sources which, for obvious reasons, we do not disclose at this time.

May 6th, 17:25 to 18:45

17:25 Primary hitman (I will refer to him as Abu Fatah) enters the media park and takes position on the roof of the energy center. He unpacks his weapon which consists of a modified Firestar handgun allowing for shoulder support and by consequence much more precision.
17:40 Volkert van der Graaf takes position in the bushes close to the parking area. At this time, Volkert van der Graaf is unaware of Abu Fatah
18:05:59 Abu Fatah fires two shots hitting Prof. Fortuyn in the upper part of his skull causing mortal trauma to the victim. The time interval between the first two shots is a little less than .30 seconds. Vokert van de Graaf at this time is approaching with his gun drawn, however does not fire yet
18:06:02 Volkert van der Graaf seems shocked and slightly paniced
18:06:05 Volkert van der Graaf starts firing at the body, while moving himself arround in a left to right direction. His shooting can be qualified as uncontrolled. He seems to hit the, at that point, dead body in three instances.
18:07:49 Volkert van der Graaf begins his escape into the direction of where he initially came from.

Note: the sequence of events between 18:05:45 and 18:07:49 originate from a transcript of a video segment inspected by a highly reliable US source. The video segment currently is not yet released to us, however we may be able to present the segment in an internet usable format any time soon. In respect to the origin of the segment, our information points at it to be stolen by an for now unnamed US Intelligence Agency. It was made part of a set of security camera video images which were removed and subsequently destroyed by most likely the Dutch AIVD. It is however not at all unlikely that the segment was part of a clandestine CIA recording, in particular the time/date format on the video would indicate this.

18:25 A witness supposedly spotted Abu Fatah entering a dark blue 7 series BMW, at a location between the main entrance to the media park and the escape route used by Volkert van der Graaf. This car shorly halted at the right side of the Insulinde laan, the witness observed a male person of probably South European or Middle Eastern descent entering the car. Description; 5.9 feet of height, well built, dressed similar to what Volkert van de Graaf was wearing on the pictures of his arrest.

Note: This account originates from on single witness, even though his/her story seems to correspond to infomation we have received earlier, this account should be handled with care.

18:27 Two independent witnesses report to have spotted the "same" BMW crossing the overpass (railroad tracks) nearby the media center.
18:40/45 Three independent witnesses report to have spotted a dark blue 7 series BMW escorted by four Police or MP motor cycles travelling at high speed between Hilversum and Amsterdam.

Note: Information we received cannot be effectively verified at this time as the witnesses in question wish to remain anonymous. From information originating from various sources and contacts indicate with very high probability that Abu Fatah was extracted from the murder scene with help of the AIVD and rushed to Schiphol Airport from where he left the country.

Background to Abu Fatah

Various American and Middle Eastern sources identify Abu Fatah as hired from a contractor close to Syrian Intelligence who earlier had provided the hitteam responsible for the staged car accident that took the live of Mr. van Traa, who headed a Dutch Parliamentary Commission Of Inquiry into the Dutch leg of a sanctioned Narcotics/Weapons line via which CIA stages from Mena Arkansas were channeled into Europe and the Middle East. The Dutch leg which basically involved the Parimaribo/Rotterdam/Prestina segment became known in the Netherlands as the IRT Affair.

The contractor, Monzer al-Kassar (some background on Mr. al-Kassar), acted as the primary Middle Eastern middleman in this line, in part as a compensation for his loss of another sanctioned line which ran from Malta/Frankfurt/London to New York.

Mr. van Traa made the unfortunate mistake to aim at a degree of exposure far exceeding his mandate which turned him into a liability to be neutralized.

Result was that a team was hired in from Monzer al Kassar which staged the accident by a well know Syrian method involving a explosive charge (C4 in this case) to be placed a on (in this case) the left frontwheel suspension of the car which at a predetermined location (in this case just prior to crossing a road construction site) would be remotely triggered by a follow-up car.

Relevance to the Prof. Fortuyn case

Prof. Fortuyn, partly influenced by a Bouterse mole within his party, became overly interested in the backgrounds of the IRT Affair and attemted to pick up where Mr. van Traa had left off. His own probing and to an extend information he was feeded with from Mr. Bouterse, who had become the fallguy in the Dutch IRT cover-up, side developed plans to expose additional and highly explosive information about the IRT cover-up and the roles of prominent Dutch officials among who Mr. Teeven, Mr. Korthals, Mr. Kok, Mr. Docters van Leeuwen (ex director of BVD) as well as the roles of the CIA, DEA, CID and BVD causing what could have become a very major national and international upset, to phrase it mildly.

The Mr. Teeven, Mr. Korthals, Mr. Kok, Mr. Docters van Leeuwen aspect

During the early nineties when Mr. Docters van Leeuwen was in function as Director Of BVD (now AIVD) ex Prime Minister Kok was for all intends and purposes an BVD operative who worked or facilitated in operational aspects of the Dutch leg of the sanctioned narcotics/weapons line mentioned earlier. In the context of this role Mr. Kok was faciltating not only the BVD but various foreign Intelligence services amomg which the CIA, DEA and by implication Syrian Intelligence through Monzer al Kassar. In 1993 after the IRT Affair came into the public attention Mr. Kok continued his facilitation and active involvement with the IRT cover-up.

In 1995 a deal struck between Mr. Kok and Mr. Teeven in which Teeven would would provide information about future narcotics/waepons deals ad corruption cases. In truth an axis Teeven/Kok was created allowing for the undisturbed operation of sanctioned lines as well as the provision of means to control possible leaks and oposition of members of the Dutch Political and Legal system. Spring 1999 Mr. Teeven produced and handed out to "het college van procureurs generaal" and the Minister of Justice at that time Mr. Korthals, a list containing 80 names of Dutch Politians, Judges, and high level civil servants who who found themselves in blackmailable positions. Information contained in the list rangend from sexual exploitation of minors to corruption and abuse of power. Important is that this list provided a garantee that what had to stay under wraps would stay under wraps. In addition this list, which as to this date is with Mr. Teeven, formed the foundation for the Dutch collusion-system to remain operational.

In December 1999 Minister Korthals, after an investigation into the allegations made in the Teeven Dossier, asserted that no conclusive evidence could be found for either the risk of blackmail or corruption. In effect Mr. Korthals became, as in fact he been for a long time, a co-conspirator in the Kok/Teeven/van Leeuwen/CIA/BVD/CID axis.

Where it is commonly assumed that this axis (minus the CIA which is never mentioned in this context) its main purpose was to minimize the damage suffered from the part exposure of IRT and savely keep the whole issue within the crimminal circuit rather as in the larger perspective of the CIA operated line. Mr. van Traa however proved unwilling to go along and suffered the consequences.

An important aspect of the whole was that, largely due to the efforts of Mr. Docters van Leeuwen, the surinam co-conspirator Mr. Bouterse was dumped and turned into an international crimminal to prosecuted in the Netherlands for among others his role in the shared narcotics/weapons scam. In effect Mr. Bouterse became the sacrificial lamb for the sins of the operators in the Dutch leg.

It may be obvious to even the most trusting citizen that the combination of a Dutch Secret Team and the Teeven Dossier ideal circumstances are created for the operation of a block of controllers and a climate in which cover-ups are easily maintained, by means of blackmailing potential deserters.

Relevance to the Prof. Fortuyn case revisted

As was indicated Prof. Fortuyn bursting into the political scene unaffected by prior affilication with the control structure and imune against most forms of blackmail, the fact that he was an homosexual who frequented the socalled "dark rooms" could hardly be used against him as he used to be rather loud about those aspects of his live, and determined to overthrow and/or exposing the ruling establishment for what it is, made him into a liability. This conjunction with own findings in the IRT context, Prof. Fortuyn was painfully aware of the existing conspiracy within the Kok/Teeven/van Leeuwen/Korthals/CIA/BVD/CID axis and its potential to blackmail a significant part of the Dutch Political/Juridical Establishment.

In addition, by means of Mrs. Bijlhout who remained loyal to her former employer, Prof. Fortuyn had received extremely damaging information from Mr. Bouterse, who largely for personal reason was more as only a little interested in setting the record straight, allowing him to effectively expose the full story of the Dutch leg and to make matters worse cause very serious damage to the CIA for their role in the cabal.

Intermediate Conclusion

In short the circumstances indicated in the above form the background to the use of Middle Eastern and namely Monzer al-Kassar's resources in the murder case. Clearly what is presented here by no means is complete or detailed but solely serves as an explanation of the role of Abu Fatah in the Prof. Fortuyn murder case.

Subsequent articles will go into far more detail and will provide sufficient evidence for an evaluation of what has been asserted here.

Home