Weisglas, F.W. (VVD)

Dear mister Weisglas,

The European members of Parliament deserve (… is do not draw improve…??) a basic income of approx. € 7000 per month (also during a reces and other free periods, so that a visit to a food bank lies not direct in the line of the expectations.

On the basis of equality of treatment in the EU it is no longer than fair that the proposal of State Secretary of Hoof in full meaning is supported, on the understanding that the koopkrachtpariteit are used to reach a honest reward. It must be therefore possible in competition with European members of parliament, of managers of hospitals and privatised usefulness companies allow people from the new countries, such as S.s. van Hoof argues for all other employees from the new Member States. Of course they must speak well the language and write, which speaks for itself. But it gives none just ministers, State Secretaries and members of Parliament and it has been fixed managers protectionist to screen concerning entering the free competition in the European Union, like in the treaties for the ordinary man and woman. See the following videos

That involves that all incomes of ministers, State Secretaries and second Member of Parliament oaths with a factor 2.4 must be reduced. In money expressed the basic income (the so-called indemnity) of a Member of Parliament € 7000 are then shared by the factor 2.4 of the koopkrachtpariteitverschil between Poland and the Netherlands. That results in a new indemnity for Member of Parliament oaths (according to the bolkestein directive and Lissabon-verdrag) of € 2916 gross per month, propagated by the VVD.

A possible solution to channel the labour migration and for the sale of industrial production the purchasing power to protect against undermining by the open free market and the ongebreidelde international competition with regard to remuneration costs is the KPB (purchasing power Pariteit tax). Such a weighed tax levy to the border of each eurocountry must be levied under European legislation which is based on the derogatory koopkrachtpariteiten between the countries concerned.

That KPB-heffing to the borders, which do not obstruct goods and passenger transport, but exclusively the onevenwichtigheden in regional purchasing power regulate, imply that employers in the rich countries of the European Union pay the minimum wage with a high remuneration level at least to the employee where also from. But that the net disbursement to an employee from the lagelonenregio who works here with regard to purchasing power equal is to those of the country where the employee lives, therefore on room level. The brutoloon for a Polish employee becomes then as such is paid that these (12,700/30,500 = 2.4 is the purchasing power factorpurchasing power factor) the brutominimumloon of € 1272.60, however, deserves, but that this remunerations are split up in two parts. , as it happens, the paid part what results in € 530 per month (apart from the costs of housing, transport etc.) and a Second part which must be worn out to the European structural fund. Superior above € 530 until the gross minimum wage of € 1272.60 must be worn out monthly that fund.

The Netherlands, but European countries also other, can let the contribution as a result, to the budget of the European Commission adapt, so that the difference in nettobetaling to the community can be regulated more equitably and more moderate, on which minister Zalm in Brussels has insisted this way strong. The financing of the advancement of is possible the infrastructure and the adaptation to the European economic averages then with labour and production of migration workers help indirectly to the country of origin and with its own people. What here in the rich west lags behind production is which they make for our prosperity. By means of KPF-afdracht the available financial resources for the European structural fund help to the countries of residence of the migratory workers; and that is honestly and desirable. The new countries do not become as a result, wingewesten for the shareholders of multinationals and for the labour agreements and employment in the west of Europe. Almost everyone satisfied….!!

Press on our labour market and other rich countries (high remunerations and high prices) will decrease as a result, because much less people from the east will come to the west, because one can gold-been affected by marginal blight no longer only deserve as a pole, Bulgaar or Rumanian for itself a purchasing power income for in the thuisland. Best and healthiest people in the new countries can build then direct and indirectly their own country. Labour migration is with that no more problem, although it is certain that the multinationals will protest are able get against each inperking eersteklas workers (because of not corrected koopkrachtpariteit) for a minimum wage here to the work with a modern type of trafficking in human beings.

With those structural funds the economic adaptations in the new countries can be financed. A higher payment to migratory workers then the minimum wage is no objection, because it also for the local employees a guarantee offers on a good reward for their labour above the lowest remunerations on minimumniveau. Everyone has not been availed thereby, tradesmen and manufacturers in the last place. It is also well for an explosive increase of food banks, occur because with the conditions of Lissabon-verdrag by verpaupering of the workers in the west there more and more poor also without work recovers, because the felle competition employers lands and to this end forces.

The purchasing power taxpurchasing power tax has large advantages. , as it happens, that the a gestation of Europe has no negative impact on the labour market, on the incomes in East and in West, and there honest competition in the complete euro zone arises, as a result of which well-being remains pro rata of the regional economic development stable and positive develops. Onderbetaling, false competition and migration of jobs are this way partly reduced, because the local economies the purchasing power preserved which is necessary economically and tax well function to be able. The Treaty of Maastricht in that respect shortage has been shot seriously and brings with therefore unforeseen dangers with itself. For this reason the treaty of Lisbon is the worst conceivable scenario. The a gestation of East and West Germany is a clear example of the economic and social onbalans.

When the political decision-making will apply this balanced remuneration structure, which is needed according to the European directives total has been seen the treaties, then remain automatically Poland in Poland, the Bulgaren in Bulgaria, the Rumanians in Romania and the Turks in Turkey. The problem for minister Verdonk has been thus solved.

Gladly I learn a response which right does to here to brought up of you.

Reported awaiting your

Kind regards,

R.M. Brockhus
Westkade 227, 1273 RJ Huizen
Phone: 035-5244141
Fax.: 035-5244142
Mail: sdn@planet.nl
Web: www.sdnl.nl

P.s. Rita Verdonk have become since its nomination such as topartist in all kinds of programmes on TV, radio and dagbladen as iron an aunt (just like ever Margareth Thatcher) the those problems presented of today will will solve when they the new list trigger becomes of the VVD. The obvious questions as: Why those problems with the VVD to the rudder have not been solved then now already? and how it comes that the prices have doubled since the euro, and who lies about that?? Herman Heinsbroek were in this recently complete clear. The social and economic deteriorations nevertheless invite not from to will vote on the VVD, or you must be really stone-blind or considerably realm.

The main question is, for which asks the press no questions concerning this type matter; and does one (only) give to large politically parties all space to swing the country beautiful and well made up sprookjesverhaal by means of the media in? Is that importance tangle? Is that dependence of subsidy or advertisement budgets?? Or is that fear for its own career, or simply nonsense? Concerning the responsibility for the ontstaan and increasing the poverty and food banks you hear nearly nothing. And also not that migration of cheap employees from the east damages our purchasing power, and that the work moves to elsewhere in the new countries. The multinationals (that now NAFTA area between Mexico and the United States flees to China and India) to still cheaper labour, thus also Mitsubishi soon complete NedCar in Born will slam. Renault did that in Belgium some years suffered also. That type predictable luxations is not brought up in the reporting. But why not.??